Lectures de linguistique expérimentale

Cette page est en construction, merci de nous envoyer des suggestions supplémentaires

Programme prévisionnel

Date	Contenu	Responsable
4/2	Notions de statistiques I (slides) (exercices)	B. Crabbé
11/2	Notions de statistiques II (slides) (exercices) (données)	B. Crabbé
25/2	Lecture (Bresnan, Cueni, Nikitina, Baayen 2007) (slides)	B. Crabbé
4/3	Méthodes expérimentales I (slides)	B. Hemforth
11/3	Méthodes expérimentales II (slides)(matériel) (papier)	B. Hemforth
18/3	Lecture (Gibson, Piantadosi, Fedorenko 2011) (slides)	Hal Tily
25/3	TD : corrections des exercices de statistiques avec R	B. Crabbé
1/4	Corpus et outils de requête (slides)	C. Plancq
8/4	Corpus et outils de requête (suite)	C. Plancq
13/5	Lecture : J. Bresnan and M. Ford, Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English. Language 86(1)	A. Abeillé
20/5	Application de la théorie de l'information à la morphologie (slides)	O. Bonami
27/5	Comptes-rendus d'expérience	J-M. Marandin
10/6	Présentation de Lexique 3	B. New
17/6	Retour d'expérience	B. Hemforth

Références diverses (F. Mouret): ( lien )
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711-733.
Bybee, Joan and Sandra Thompson. 2000. Three frequency effects in syntax. in Bybee, Joan (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joan Bresnan. 2007. "Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation." In Roots: Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base.. Series: Studies in Generative Grammar, edited by Sam Featherston and Wolfgang Sternefeld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77--96.
Joan Bresnan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and Harald Baayen. 2007. "Predicting the Dative Alternation." In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, ed. by G. Boume, I. Kraemer, and J. Zwarts. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, pp. 69--94. 33 pages. Pdf.
Joan Bresnan and Marilyn Ford. 2010. "Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English." Language 86(1): 186--213.
E. Gibson, The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research, Language and Cognitive Processes.(accepted)
T. Wasow, Postverbal behavior, CSLI, 2002.

P. Blache, B. Hemforth, S. Rauzy, Acceptability Prediction by Means of Grammaticality Quantification (lien)
B. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984) Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson, and Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72:32-68.
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Sage.
Featherston, Sam. 2005a. Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Lingua 115.
Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Keller, Frank. 2003. A psychophysical law for linguistic judgments. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society .
Sorace, Antonella, and Frank Keller. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115:1497-1524.
Schütze, Carson. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. The University of Chicago Press.
Stevens, Stanley Smith. 1957. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review 64:153-181.

A. Agresti, An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis,Wiley 2007
H. Baayen, Analyzing Linguistic Data, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
D. Howell, Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines, De boeck, 1997
Rietveld Toni & Roeland Van Hout. 2005. Statistics in language research: Analysis of variance. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
C. Robson, Experiment, Design and Statistics in Psychology, (3rd ed), Blackwell,Penguin Books, 1994 (lien)